AaSelect font sizeSet to dark mode
AaSelect font sizeSet to dark mode
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalized content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
1 Samuel 17:31-39 meaning
David spoke words of faith and courage which stood out from among all the words of fear and cowardice spoken by the men of Israel. David's words brought encouragement and hope to those who heard them and were ultimately told to Saul, so he sent for David.
David continued with words of strength and courage in the presence of Saul and said, "Let no man's heart fail on account of Goliath; your servant will go and fight with this Philistine." Saul, doubtful, replied, "You are not able to go against this Philistine to fight with him; for you are but a youth while he has been a warrior from his youth."
In 1 Samuel 16:18, one of Saul's servants described David as "a mighty man of valor, and a warrior" indicating that David might have been young but was also powerful. Saul would have been familiar with David, as Saul had made David an armor bearer (1 Samuel 16:21). It could be that Saul already knew of David's capabilities as a slinger.
David answers by testifying of God's faithfulness to him in giving him the skills to kill a lion and a bear:
"Your servant was tending his father's sheep. When a lion or a bear came and took a lamb from the flock, I went out after him and attacked him, and rescued it from his mouth; and when he rose up against me, I seized him by his beard and struck him and killed him. Your servant has killed both the lion and the bear; and this uncircumcised Philistine will be like one of them, since he has taunted the armies of the living God."
David would have tended his father's sheep in the pastures near Bethlehem, and in the Judean wilderness. While tending the sheep, he had occasion to encounter both a lion as well as a bear. These predators were after an easy meal, and took a lamb from the flock. When this occurred, David chased them. He went out after him and attacked him. We can infer from what is about to transpire that David attacked both the lion and the bear with his sling. In each case, he likely would have to had hit them with a shot in the head in order to subdue them. It is possible that David is presenting an image of hitting the lion in the head with a sling shot, knocking him senseless, then grabbing the lion by his beard and cutting his throat while he is still stunned. Similar to the fate he imagines for Goliath.
David continues and declares it was God who granted him victory over the lion and the bear. "The LORD who delivered me from the paw of the lion and from the paw of the bear, He will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine." Both in David's words and deeds we can see evidence of what was stated of David in the prior chapter, that the "Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon David" from the moment David was anointed by Samuel.
David is quite confident. It is in large part because of his faith in God, and God's spirit upon him. But it is also due to his preparation and experience. David had great confidence in his ability with the sling. He did not fight the bear or the lion on their terms. And neither would he fight Goliath on his terms. To a skilled slinger, Goliath was an oversized, stationary target.
Saul being encouraged by David's spirit of faith and courage, as well as his testimony of victory over the lion and the bear, said to him, "Go, and may the LORD be with you." Faith and courage are attractive and contagious attributes to those who witness them. Hebrews 11 spends an entire chapter commemorating people of tremendous faith and courage.
Then Saul attempted to clothe David with his garments and a bronze helmet on his head and other Israelite armor. David girded Saul's sword over his armor and tried to walk, for he had not tested them. Perhaps out of respect for Saul, David tried on the armor he offered. Since Saul was a head taller than most (1 Samuel 9:2), and David was able to put it on, it tells us David was full grown. David girded his sword over his armor and tried to walk. David likely had in mind that his primary advantage was mobility. He would be mobile, while Goliath would be virtually stationary, and David would maneuver to get a good angle so he could knock down Goliath with his stone. Accordingly, David declined the armor.
So David said to Saul, "I cannot go with these, for I have not tested them." By this David means "I am not used to them." And David took them off. David had a plan; it was mobility and accuracy verses armor and brute strength. The armor did not fit the plan. So David left them behind. Saul does not object. David's plan was thinking out of the box. Goliath did not specify that the combat had to be done a certain way (although he will soon try to shift the terms). In an ancient sort of way, David has proposed to "take a gun to a knife fight." He is going to have a long-distance weapon against a big target with a sword, spear, and javelin. Saul must have decided, "You know, this just might work" because he gave approval to the plan.
In ancient times, slinging was an accepted method of warfare. David had apparently convinced Saul that he was an expert. We are not told that Saul asked for a demonstration. The Lord moved on his heart to give David his approval.