Menahem’s short-lived payment to Assyria offers a lesson that leaning on earthly powers for security often produces fleeting relief and deeper entanglement.
In the days following the death of King Jeroboam II (753 BC), the northern kingdom of Israel was in a period of political upheaval. Several rulers took the throne, often through violence or conspiracy (2 Kings 15:8-31). Menahem was one such ruler who sought foreign alliances to secure his power. The Scripture states, “Then Menahem exacted the money from Israel, even from all the mighty men of wealth, from each man fifty shekels of silver to pay the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria returned and did not remain there in the land.” (v. 20). Here, Menahem forced his people to pay a heavy tribute, using the nation’s wealthiest citizens as a source of funds. By doing so, he was able to appease Assyria and keep its armies from a more forceful occupation.
During Menahem’s reign (circa 752-742 BC), the Assyrian Empire was growing rapidly, exerting control and extracting taxes from weaker nations in the region. The phrase “from each man fifty shekels of silver” (v. 20) reveals the heavy burden this tribute represented. These required payments put financial strain on Israel’s populace. Many Israelites likely viewed them as an oppressive measure that stripped the nation of its resources 2 Kings 15:8-31). Nonetheless, Menahem’s primary concern was keeping Assyria from sacking his kingdom, a short-term strategy that later proved ineffective for Israel’s long-term stability.
The verse concludes with the statement, “So the king of Assyria returned and did not remain there in the land” (v. 20). Although this tribute accomplished the immediate goal of preventing an Assyrian incursion, it came at the cost of Israel’s autonomy. Menahem’s approach foreshadows the broader pattern in Israel’s history where alliances with powerful nations supplanted trust in God’s protection, eventually leading to greater subjugation Hosea 8:1-4).
Set to dark mode
2 Kings 15:20 meaning
In the days following the death of King Jeroboam II (753 BC), the northern kingdom of Israel was in a period of political upheaval. Several rulers took the throne, often through violence or conspiracy (2 Kings 15:8-31). Menahem was one such ruler who sought foreign alliances to secure his power. The Scripture states, “Then Menahem exacted the money from Israel, even from all the mighty men of wealth, from each man fifty shekels of silver to pay the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria returned and did not remain there in the land.” (v. 20). Here, Menahem forced his people to pay a heavy tribute, using the nation’s wealthiest citizens as a source of funds. By doing so, he was able to appease Assyria and keep its armies from a more forceful occupation.
During Menahem’s reign (circa 752-742 BC), the Assyrian Empire was growing rapidly, exerting control and extracting taxes from weaker nations in the region. The phrase “from each man fifty shekels of silver” (v. 20) reveals the heavy burden this tribute represented. These required payments put financial strain on Israel’s populace. Many Israelites likely viewed them as an oppressive measure that stripped the nation of its resources 2 Kings 15:8-31). Nonetheless, Menahem’s primary concern was keeping Assyria from sacking his kingdom, a short-term strategy that later proved ineffective for Israel’s long-term stability.
The verse concludes with the statement, “So the king of Assyria returned and did not remain there in the land” (v. 20). Although this tribute accomplished the immediate goal of preventing an Assyrian incursion, it came at the cost of Israel’s autonomy. Menahem’s approach foreshadows the broader pattern in Israel’s history where alliances with powerful nations supplanted trust in God’s protection, eventually leading to greater subjugation Hosea 8:1-4).