They assert their intention was sincere and question why their fellow Israelites should be upset when no unjust gain was taken.
“And all the men of Judah answered the men of Israel, ‘Because the king is a close relative to us. Why then are you angry about this matter? Have we eaten at all at the king’s expense, or has anything been taken for us?’” (v.42)
This exchange takes place after King David’s victory over Absalom’s rebellion (2 Samuel 15-18). David reigned as the second king of Israel from around 1010-970 BC and came from the tribe of Judah. Following Absalom’s defeat, David was poised to return to Jerusalem. The men of Judah, David’s own tribe, took the lead in escorting him back across the Jordan, provoking jealousy among the other tribes of Israel. Here, the men of Judah defend their actions by noting that David is “a close relative” to them, reassuring the northern tribes that they had neither used the king’s resources inappropriately nor gained any unfair advantage.
The men of Israel and the men of Judah jointly made up God’s chosen people—descendants of Abraham. However, their rivalry sometimes flared, especially under the strain of political shifts. In this verse, the men of Judah ask plainly if Israel suspects that Judah exploited David’s favor for selfish gain or royal privileges. Their rhetorical questions—“Have we eaten at all at the king’s expense?” and “has anything been taken for us?”—make their innocence clear, highlighting that the king’s homecoming was arranged out of familial duty rather than personal profit. This moment also underscores the fragile unity of the nation, soon to be tested again in later years.
In a broader sense, David’s tribe bridging his return points ahead to a recurring biblical theme of God’s promises through Judah (Genesis 49:10). Centuries later, Jesus, also from the line of David in Judah (Matthew 1:1), would offer peace and reconciliation not just to one tribe but to all peoples, uniting them under His kingship (Ephesians 2:14). This verse reminds us that leadership rooted in genuine loyalty and mutual respect is the surest path to restoring harmony.
Set to dark mode
2 Samuel 19:42 meaning
“And all the men of Judah answered the men of Israel, ‘Because the king is a close relative to us. Why then are you angry about this matter? Have we eaten at all at the king’s expense, or has anything been taken for us?’” (v.42)
This exchange takes place after King David’s victory over Absalom’s rebellion (2 Samuel 15-18). David reigned as the second king of Israel from around 1010-970 BC and came from the tribe of Judah. Following Absalom’s defeat, David was poised to return to Jerusalem. The men of Judah, David’s own tribe, took the lead in escorting him back across the Jordan, provoking jealousy among the other tribes of Israel. Here, the men of Judah defend their actions by noting that David is “a close relative” to them, reassuring the northern tribes that they had neither used the king’s resources inappropriately nor gained any unfair advantage.
The men of Israel and the men of Judah jointly made up God’s chosen people—descendants of Abraham. However, their rivalry sometimes flared, especially under the strain of political shifts. In this verse, the men of Judah ask plainly if Israel suspects that Judah exploited David’s favor for selfish gain or royal privileges. Their rhetorical questions—“Have we eaten at all at the king’s expense?” and “has anything been taken for us?”—make their innocence clear, highlighting that the king’s homecoming was arranged out of familial duty rather than personal profit. This moment also underscores the fragile unity of the nation, soon to be tested again in later years.
In a broader sense, David’s tribe bridging his return points ahead to a recurring biblical theme of God’s promises through Judah (Genesis 49:10). Centuries later, Jesus, also from the line of David in Judah (Matthew 1:1), would offer peace and reconciliation not just to one tribe but to all peoples, uniting them under His kingship (Ephesians 2:14). This verse reminds us that leadership rooted in genuine loyalty and mutual respect is the surest path to restoring harmony.