Alliances with men may bring immediate relief, but they often invite deeper strife.
In describing how King Asa of Judah forged an alliance with the Aramean king, Scripture states, “So Ben-hadad listened to King Asa and sent the commanders of his armies against the cities of Israel, and they conquered Ijon, Dan, Abel-maim and all the store cities of Naphtali.” (v.4) This occurred during King Asa’s reign (910-869 BC), when he chose to rely on Ben-hadad’s military might rather than fully trusting the LORD for deliverance. Ben-hadad ruled the region of Aram (or Syria) from Damascus, exerting influence over a broad territory north of Israel. By paying tribute, Asa convinced Ben-hadad to attack the northern kingdom, weakening Israel’s king while preserving Judah’s interests. Ironically, Asa’s decision underscored the spiritual lesson repeated throughout the Old Testament: God’s people suffer when they pursue human alliances instead of divine guidance Psalm 20:7).
In this verse, the specific cities “Ijon, Dan, Abel-maim and all the store cities of Naphtali” (v.4) show that Ben-hadad’s forces invaded prominent locations in northern Israel. Dan marked Israel’s northernmost boundary, historically a vulnerable region prone to conflict and idolatry (Judges 18:27-31). Naphtali, settled near the Sea of Galilee, often contended with surrounding nations commentary_JDG_1_30). These areas contained significant resources and storehouses, so their capture by an Aramean army spelled both economic and strategic loss. Rather than experiencing divine protection, King Asa’s pragmatic alliance created new insecurities for the northern kingdom and foreshadowed ongoing power struggles that would plague Israel.
This moment also connects to God’s overarching plan of redemption, revealing how imperfect leaders and alliances highlight humanity’s need for a righteous King (Luke 1:32-33). A future Son of David would one day rule with divine wisdom and faithfulness, fulfilling the kingdom promises that flawed mortal kings like Asa and Ben-hadad could never secure. God’s people are continually reminded that wholehearted reliance on the LORD is the pathway to lasting security and peace.
God responded to Asa’s choice by sending a prophet to condemn the king’s misplaced trust (2 Chronicles 16:7-9), warning that human alliances apart from Him lead to further conflict.
Set to dark mode
2 Chronicles 16:4 meaning
In describing how King Asa of Judah forged an alliance with the Aramean king, Scripture states, “So Ben-hadad listened to King Asa and sent the commanders of his armies against the cities of Israel, and they conquered Ijon, Dan, Abel-maim and all the store cities of Naphtali.” (v.4) This occurred during King Asa’s reign (910-869 BC), when he chose to rely on Ben-hadad’s military might rather than fully trusting the LORD for deliverance. Ben-hadad ruled the region of Aram (or Syria) from Damascus, exerting influence over a broad territory north of Israel. By paying tribute, Asa convinced Ben-hadad to attack the northern kingdom, weakening Israel’s king while preserving Judah’s interests. Ironically, Asa’s decision underscored the spiritual lesson repeated throughout the Old Testament: God’s people suffer when they pursue human alliances instead of divine guidance Psalm 20:7).
In this verse, the specific cities “Ijon, Dan, Abel-maim and all the store cities of Naphtali” (v.4) show that Ben-hadad’s forces invaded prominent locations in northern Israel. Dan marked Israel’s northernmost boundary, historically a vulnerable region prone to conflict and idolatry (Judges 18:27-31). Naphtali, settled near the Sea of Galilee, often contended with surrounding nations commentary_JDG_1_30). These areas contained significant resources and storehouses, so their capture by an Aramean army spelled both economic and strategic loss. Rather than experiencing divine protection, King Asa’s pragmatic alliance created new insecurities for the northern kingdom and foreshadowed ongoing power struggles that would plague Israel.
This moment also connects to God’s overarching plan of redemption, revealing how imperfect leaders and alliances highlight humanity’s need for a righteous King (Luke 1:32-33). A future Son of David would one day rule with divine wisdom and faithfulness, fulfilling the kingdom promises that flawed mortal kings like Asa and Ben-hadad could never secure. God’s people are continually reminded that wholehearted reliance on the LORD is the pathway to lasting security and peace.
God responded to Asa’s choice by sending a prophet to condemn the king’s misplaced trust (2 Chronicles 16:7-9), warning that human alliances apart from Him lead to further conflict.