David declines Absalom’s invitation to prevent burdening him, yet he offers a fatherly blessing that shows care and caution in equal measure.
But the king said to Absalom, “No, my son, we should not all go, lest we be burdensome to you.” Although he urged him, he would not go, but blessed him. (v.25) King David, who ruled over Israel from around 1010 to 970 B.C., responds to his son Absalom’s invitation by declining to attend a feast. In doing so, David shows concern that taking his entire royal entourage to Absalom’s event would create undue pressure or expense for his son. Ancient feasts often required extensive travel and preparation, which placed significant demands on the host, especially when royalty was involved. Although Absalom insists, David remains firm in declining, then gives his blessing before sending Absalom on his way.
“Although he urged him, he would not go, but blessed him.” (v.25) underscores a delicate balance between fatherly affection and the realities of royal life. David’s refusal, despite Absalom’s urging, reflects his careful leadership style—he does not wish to overshadow his son’s hospitality or to shift royal responsibilities in a way that might strain Absalom’s resources. Historically, Absalom is David’s third son (born approximately in the early 990s B.C.), and he fits into a turbulent timeline following David’s earlier family struggles. In the broader story, Absalom’s attempt to gather his family may hide deeper motives that will become more evident as the narrative unfolds (2 Samuel 13:26-29), foreshadowing his growing discontent and eventual revolt.
Though the specific location in this passage is not named in verse 25 itself, the broader context of 2 Samuel 13:23 mentions Baal-hazor near Ephraim, some ten miles northeast of what is now Jerusalem. This area, which was part of the tribal territory of Ephraim, would have been fertile and well-suited for gatherings such as sheep-shearing feasts. David’s decision to stay behind and only bless Absalom highlights a father’s desire to honor his son’s celebration—while also exercising wisdom that reflects the tension within his family. It provides yet another example of how God’s chosen leaders, including David, were not immune to relational strains. Jesus’ own teaching later in the New Testament emphasizes loving family relationships yet also reminds believers that familial discord can still result from sinful choices (Matthew 10:35-36).
Set to dark mode
2 Samuel 13:25 meaning
But the king said to Absalom, “No, my son, we should not all go, lest we be burdensome to you.” Although he urged him, he would not go, but blessed him. (v.25) King David, who ruled over Israel from around 1010 to 970 B.C., responds to his son Absalom’s invitation by declining to attend a feast. In doing so, David shows concern that taking his entire royal entourage to Absalom’s event would create undue pressure or expense for his son. Ancient feasts often required extensive travel and preparation, which placed significant demands on the host, especially when royalty was involved. Although Absalom insists, David remains firm in declining, then gives his blessing before sending Absalom on his way.
“Although he urged him, he would not go, but blessed him.” (v.25) underscores a delicate balance between fatherly affection and the realities of royal life. David’s refusal, despite Absalom’s urging, reflects his careful leadership style—he does not wish to overshadow his son’s hospitality or to shift royal responsibilities in a way that might strain Absalom’s resources. Historically, Absalom is David’s third son (born approximately in the early 990s B.C.), and he fits into a turbulent timeline following David’s earlier family struggles. In the broader story, Absalom’s attempt to gather his family may hide deeper motives that will become more evident as the narrative unfolds (2 Samuel 13:26-29), foreshadowing his growing discontent and eventual revolt.
Though the specific location in this passage is not named in verse 25 itself, the broader context of 2 Samuel 13:23 mentions Baal-hazor near Ephraim, some ten miles northeast of what is now Jerusalem. This area, which was part of the tribal territory of Ephraim, would have been fertile and well-suited for gatherings such as sheep-shearing feasts. David’s decision to stay behind and only bless Absalom highlights a father’s desire to honor his son’s celebration—while also exercising wisdom that reflects the tension within his family. It provides yet another example of how God’s chosen leaders, including David, were not immune to relational strains. Jesus’ own teaching later in the New Testament emphasizes loving family relationships yet also reminds believers that familial discord can still result from sinful choices (Matthew 10:35-36).