Absalom’s repeated attempts to reach Joab highlight how determined he was to mend his standing in the kingdom and with his father.
In this passage, we see “Then Absalom sent for Joab, to send him to the king, but he would not come to him. So he sent again a second time, but he would not come” (v.29). Absalom, the third son of King David, had been allowed to return to Jerusalem after his exile, yet he had not fully reestablished a relationship with his father (2 Samuel 14:21-24). Absalom wanted to secure Joab’s help in making an appeal to King David, but as this verse notes, Joab resisted his summons twice. Joab, the commander of David’s army, was a key figure in David’s court around 1000-970 BC, and his actions or inactions often held great significance in the kingdom. Meanwhile, Jerusalem served as King David’s capital, located in the southern region of ancient Israel, a city that would later become central to much of biblical history.
The repeated attempts “So he sent again a second time, but he would not come” (v.29) reflect Absalom’s growing frustration at not being able to move forward in restoring his status. Absalom was a powerful figure who had once been banished for avenging his sister Tamar by killing his half-brother Amnon. Over time, he wanted to regain favor with his father, King David, and sought Joab’s influence to facilitate that. However, Joab’s refusal to respond underscores some tension and weariness on Joab’s part. This complicated dynamic symbolized the underlying broken relationships within David’s family—relationships that often illustrate the consequences of unaddressed conflicts. The concepts of restoration and reconciliation echo throughout Scripture, and in the New Testament, Jesus teaches about persistent pursuit in reconciliation (Matthew 5:23-24).
At this historical point, David’s reign (which scholars often date to around 1010-970 BC) had endured a series of internal struggles. Absalom’s attempt to communicate through an intermediary demonstrates the distance he felt from his father, both physically and emotionally. The verse anticipates Absalom’s more dramatic actions to capture Joab’s attention (v.30), revealing how strained communication can accelerate discontent. The passage invites readers to reflect on the cost of unresolved wrongs and the importance of actively seeking restoration—gestures that prefigure the ultimate work of reconciliation fulfilled in the person of Christ, who unites us to God by grace (Ephesians 2:13-16).
Set to dark mode
2 Samuel 14:29 meaning
In this passage, we see “Then Absalom sent for Joab, to send him to the king, but he would not come to him. So he sent again a second time, but he would not come” (v.29). Absalom, the third son of King David, had been allowed to return to Jerusalem after his exile, yet he had not fully reestablished a relationship with his father (2 Samuel 14:21-24). Absalom wanted to secure Joab’s help in making an appeal to King David, but as this verse notes, Joab resisted his summons twice. Joab, the commander of David’s army, was a key figure in David’s court around 1000-970 BC, and his actions or inactions often held great significance in the kingdom. Meanwhile, Jerusalem served as King David’s capital, located in the southern region of ancient Israel, a city that would later become central to much of biblical history.
The repeated attempts “So he sent again a second time, but he would not come” (v.29) reflect Absalom’s growing frustration at not being able to move forward in restoring his status. Absalom was a powerful figure who had once been banished for avenging his sister Tamar by killing his half-brother Amnon. Over time, he wanted to regain favor with his father, King David, and sought Joab’s influence to facilitate that. However, Joab’s refusal to respond underscores some tension and weariness on Joab’s part. This complicated dynamic symbolized the underlying broken relationships within David’s family—relationships that often illustrate the consequences of unaddressed conflicts. The concepts of restoration and reconciliation echo throughout Scripture, and in the New Testament, Jesus teaches about persistent pursuit in reconciliation (Matthew 5:23-24).
At this historical point, David’s reign (which scholars often date to around 1010-970 BC) had endured a series of internal struggles. Absalom’s attempt to communicate through an intermediary demonstrates the distance he felt from his father, both physically and emotionally. The verse anticipates Absalom’s more dramatic actions to capture Joab’s attention (v.30), revealing how strained communication can accelerate discontent. The passage invites readers to reflect on the cost of unresolved wrongs and the importance of actively seeking restoration—gestures that prefigure the ultimate work of reconciliation fulfilled in the person of Christ, who unites us to God by grace (Ephesians 2:13-16).