This verse demonstrates how Absalom’s rebellion gained serious momentum as he and the men of Israel took strategic positions in Gilead.
Then the verse says, “Then Israel and Absalom camped in the land of Gilead.” (2 Samuel 17:26). At this point in the narrative, Absalom—King David’s third son (born to him around 1000 BC)—had risen up against his father and set himself in opposition to David’s rule. By occupying the land of Gilead, on the east side of the Jordan River, Absalom strategically positioned his forces to prepare for further conflict with David’s loyalists. Gilead was known in ancient times for its rugged terrain and for the balm produced from its trees, and served as an important region for Israel’s tribal inheritances. Although the verse itself is brief, it illustrates Absalom’s growing boldness in leading a very real threat against his father’s kingdom.
Absalom’s rebellion is woven into the account of King David’s later years, culminating in open warfare between father and son (2 Samuel 15-18). Historically speaking, David ruled Israel from around 1010-970 BC, and Absalom’s revolt took place well into David’s reign. Scripture describes how Absalom capitalized on discontent within the nation to gain popular support, ultimately forcing his father—renowned for his faithfulness and humility—to flee Jerusalem. Elsewhere, the Bible describes David’s character even while being deposed by Absalom, noting that David refused to seek vengeance on those who cursed him, reflecting his dependence on the LORD rather than on human power.Despite the betrayal, the greater theme running through 2 Samuel is that God remains sovereign over Israel’s leadership. David’s trust in the LORD stands in stark contrast to Absalom’s grasp for power. Gilead itself, mentioned in this verse, becomes the backdrop for their confrontation. Though Absalom’s camp here seems poised for victory, the ensuing narrative shows how human schemes ultimately give way to God’s overarching design for Israel, fulfilling His promises despite human failings.
Set to dark mode
2 Samuel 17:26 meaning
Then the verse says, “Then Israel and Absalom camped in the land of Gilead.” (2 Samuel 17:26). At this point in the narrative, Absalom—King David’s third son (born to him around 1000 BC)—had risen up against his father and set himself in opposition to David’s rule. By occupying the land of Gilead, on the east side of the Jordan River, Absalom strategically positioned his forces to prepare for further conflict with David’s loyalists. Gilead was known in ancient times for its rugged terrain and for the balm produced from its trees, and served as an important region for Israel’s tribal inheritances. Although the verse itself is brief, it illustrates Absalom’s growing boldness in leading a very real threat against his father’s kingdom.
Absalom’s rebellion is woven into the account of King David’s later years, culminating in open warfare between father and son (2 Samuel 15-18). Historically speaking, David ruled Israel from around 1010-970 BC, and Absalom’s revolt took place well into David’s reign. Scripture describes how Absalom capitalized on discontent within the nation to gain popular support, ultimately forcing his father—renowned for his faithfulness and humility—to flee Jerusalem. Elsewhere, the Bible describes David’s character even while being deposed by Absalom, noting that David refused to seek vengeance on those who cursed him, reflecting his dependence on the LORD rather than on human power.Despite the betrayal, the greater theme running through 2 Samuel is that God remains sovereign over Israel’s leadership. David’s trust in the LORD stands in stark contrast to Absalom’s grasp for power. Gilead itself, mentioned in this verse, becomes the backdrop for their confrontation. Though Absalom’s camp here seems poised for victory, the ensuing narrative shows how human schemes ultimately give way to God’s overarching design for Israel, fulfilling His promises despite human failings.