This verse reveals a contested kingship that contrasted with God’s ultimate plan to establish David’s lineage—a lineage that would lead to the Messiah.
In this passage, Abner, the commander of Saul’s army, elevates Saul’s son Ish-bosheth to rule over a wide swath of Israel following Saul’s death. The scripture states, “And he made him king over Gilead, over the Ashurites, over Jezreel, over Ephraim, and over Benjamin, even over all Israel.” (v.9) Here, “he” refers to Abner, and “him” denotes Ish-bosheth. Historically, this event likely occurred around 1010 BC, just after Saul’s defeat and death. Saul’s son Ish-bosheth thus became the nominal king of the northern tribes, while David simultaneously established his rule over Judah from Hebron. This division set the stage for a power struggle that would eventually lead to David’s unification of Israel under his own kingship.
The first region named is Gilead, noted in scripture as a mountainous zone east of the Jordan River. Gilead was known for its vast hills and had been home to a variety of Israelite tribes, sometimes providing a place of temporary refuge (see also the references to Gilead as “a mountainous region east of the Jordan River”). Next, the passage highlights Ephraim, a dominant central tribe in the northern kingdom, often used in scripture to represent Israel as a whole because of its considerable influence. Benjamin, too, was a key tribe, eventually becoming part of the southern kingdom after the monarchy’s division. Both Ephraim and Benjamin are mentioned to emphasize Ish-bosheth’s nominal rule over key tribal territories, though his strength was largely dependent on Abner’s military and political backing.
Spiritually, Ish-bosheth’s brief kingship draws attention to the fragility of human leadership when it exists apart from the Lord’s anointing. Even though he was of Saul’s lineage, Ish-bosheth lacked spiritual authority and ultimately served as a placeholder until David’s ascension to the full throne of Israel. His short reign underscores the contrast between God’s chosen king, David, who points forward to the ultimate King in the line of David—Jesus Christ—and human attempts to secure power and legitimacy by earthly means.
Ish-bosheth’s attempt to reign over the northern tribes revealed the wavering loyalty of the people and the persistent need for a God-appointed leader to unify the nation under righteous rule.
Set to dark mode
2 Samuel 2:9 meaning
In this passage, Abner, the commander of Saul’s army, elevates Saul’s son Ish-bosheth to rule over a wide swath of Israel following Saul’s death. The scripture states, “And he made him king over Gilead, over the Ashurites, over Jezreel, over Ephraim, and over Benjamin, even over all Israel.” (v.9) Here, “he” refers to Abner, and “him” denotes Ish-bosheth. Historically, this event likely occurred around 1010 BC, just after Saul’s defeat and death. Saul’s son Ish-bosheth thus became the nominal king of the northern tribes, while David simultaneously established his rule over Judah from Hebron. This division set the stage for a power struggle that would eventually lead to David’s unification of Israel under his own kingship.
The first region named is Gilead, noted in scripture as a mountainous zone east of the Jordan River. Gilead was known for its vast hills and had been home to a variety of Israelite tribes, sometimes providing a place of temporary refuge (see also the references to Gilead as “a mountainous region east of the Jordan River”). Next, the passage highlights Ephraim, a dominant central tribe in the northern kingdom, often used in scripture to represent Israel as a whole because of its considerable influence. Benjamin, too, was a key tribe, eventually becoming part of the southern kingdom after the monarchy’s division. Both Ephraim and Benjamin are mentioned to emphasize Ish-bosheth’s nominal rule over key tribal territories, though his strength was largely dependent on Abner’s military and political backing.
Spiritually, Ish-bosheth’s brief kingship draws attention to the fragility of human leadership when it exists apart from the Lord’s anointing. Even though he was of Saul’s lineage, Ish-bosheth lacked spiritual authority and ultimately served as a placeholder until David’s ascension to the full throne of Israel. His short reign underscores the contrast between God’s chosen king, David, who points forward to the ultimate King in the line of David—Jesus Christ—and human attempts to secure power and legitimacy by earthly means.
Ish-bosheth’s attempt to reign over the northern tribes revealed the wavering loyalty of the people and the persistent need for a God-appointed leader to unify the nation under righteous rule.