He achieved short-lived success through cunning and generosity, but his time of prosperity soon faded.
According to Daniel’s prophecy, “In a time of tranquility he will enter the richest parts of the realm, and he will accomplish what his fathers never did, nor his ancestors; he will distribute plunder, booty and possessions among them, and he will devise his schemes against strongholds, but only for a time.” (v.24) This verse portrays a leader who takes advantage of moments of peace to cause unexpected upheaval. He exploits prosperous regions for personal gain, indicating a crafty strategy that enables him to gather wealth and distribute it in a way that his forefathers did not. Historically, many scholars agree this leader is Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who ruled the Seleucid Empire from 175 BC to 164 BC. During his reign, he invaded wealthier territories, such as parts of Ptolemaic Egypt in North Africa, establishing influence by subtly sowing discord and seizing control of resources. The Seleucid Empire stretched across parts of modern-day Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and beyond, with a central power base in Antioch—this geographically extensive domain enabled rulers like Antiochus IV to reach and plunder affluent regions that had previously escaped his ancestors.
Within the verse, the phrase “he will distribute plunder, booty and possessions among them” (v.24) indicates an unusual tactic: rather than hoarding wealth, he strategically shared it to win loyalty and bolster his power. By forming alliances through generosity, he accomplished feats his forefathers never achieved. This tactic aligns with historical reports that Antiochus IV sought to seize lands and redistribute wealth to maintain favor among local aristocrats, merchants, or military leaders. Such cunning behavior mirrors warnings throughout Scripture of self-serving leadership (see examples from Old Testament prophets who critiqued ungodly rulers, and from New Testament references to worldly powers). Jesus Himself laid out principles for discerning the motives of leaders (references include Matthew 10:16), cautioning believers to remain wise and not be swayed by superficial generosity.
Finally, the verse reminds readers of the temporary nature of such apparently unstoppable power, as it states “…but only for a time.” (v.24) Antiochus IV Epiphanes appeared politically invincible temporarily, yet his end came swiftly when he faced opposition both internally and from more formidable forces. His death in 164 BC effectively cut short his schemes, confirming this prophetic statement that even the mightiest rulers operate within the limits imposed by God’s sovereignty. This truth echoes throughout biblical history, showing that human powers, however great, do not last forever but yield to divine authority in the end.
Set to dark mode
Daniel 11:24 meaning
According to Daniel’s prophecy, “In a time of tranquility he will enter the richest parts of the realm, and he will accomplish what his fathers never did, nor his ancestors; he will distribute plunder, booty and possessions among them, and he will devise his schemes against strongholds, but only for a time.” (v.24) This verse portrays a leader who takes advantage of moments of peace to cause unexpected upheaval. He exploits prosperous regions for personal gain, indicating a crafty strategy that enables him to gather wealth and distribute it in a way that his forefathers did not. Historically, many scholars agree this leader is Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who ruled the Seleucid Empire from 175 BC to 164 BC. During his reign, he invaded wealthier territories, such as parts of Ptolemaic Egypt in North Africa, establishing influence by subtly sowing discord and seizing control of resources. The Seleucid Empire stretched across parts of modern-day Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and beyond, with a central power base in Antioch—this geographically extensive domain enabled rulers like Antiochus IV to reach and plunder affluent regions that had previously escaped his ancestors.
Within the verse, the phrase “he will distribute plunder, booty and possessions among them” (v.24) indicates an unusual tactic: rather than hoarding wealth, he strategically shared it to win loyalty and bolster his power. By forming alliances through generosity, he accomplished feats his forefathers never achieved. This tactic aligns with historical reports that Antiochus IV sought to seize lands and redistribute wealth to maintain favor among local aristocrats, merchants, or military leaders. Such cunning behavior mirrors warnings throughout Scripture of self-serving leadership (see examples from Old Testament prophets who critiqued ungodly rulers, and from New Testament references to worldly powers). Jesus Himself laid out principles for discerning the motives of leaders (references include Matthew 10:16), cautioning believers to remain wise and not be swayed by superficial generosity.
Finally, the verse reminds readers of the temporary nature of such apparently unstoppable power, as it states “…but only for a time.” (v.24) Antiochus IV Epiphanes appeared politically invincible temporarily, yet his end came swiftly when he faced opposition both internally and from more formidable forces. His death in 164 BC effectively cut short his schemes, confirming this prophetic statement that even the mightiest rulers operate within the limits imposed by God’s sovereignty. This truth echoes throughout biblical history, showing that human powers, however great, do not last forever but yield to divine authority in the end.