The verse shows that Jerusalem’s history carried the stigma of a rebellious past but also the promise of future renewal.
“so that a search may be made in the record books of your fathers. And you will discover in the record books and learn that that city is a rebellious city and damaging to kings and provinces, and that they have incited revolt within it in past days; therefore that city was laid waste.” (Ezra 4:15) In this verse, the officials who oppose the rebuilding of Jerusalem wrote to King Artaxerxes (who reigned from about 465 BC to 424 BC) urging him to look into the historical records of their predecessors (v.15). Their goal was to prove that Jerusalem, the city being rebuilt by the returning exiles, had a long-standing reputation for political rebellion. The tactic they employed was to paint the city and its people as a threat, persuading the king that allowing the reconstruction to continue would be detrimental to Persia’s rule. This city they are referencing is Jerusalem, located in the region historically known as Judah. Jerusalem sits in the central part of the Judean hills, an area of great significance in the biblical record because it served as the political and spiritual capital under King David (around 1010-970 BC) and his successors. By claiming that records in the archives would confirm the rebellious nature of Jerusalem, these opponents intended to alarm King Artaxerxes into stopping the work. Their accusation echoes prior challenges faced by God’s people who were striving to obey Him by restoring the temple and reestablishing worship in Jerusalem (see also accounts of opposition in Nehemiah 4:7-8).
When the passage mentions “damaging to kings and provinces” (v.15), it underscores how the opponents were systematically framing the Jews’ rebuilding efforts as a threat to the stability of the Persian Empire. At that time, Persia was vast, encompassing multiple regions and peoples, and any sign of rebellion could quickly spread. The phrase “they have incited revolt within it in past days” (v.15) reflects how the city’s history—under certain kings—contained uprisings or resistance to foreign rule. Notably, Jerusalem had faced conquest and destruction under the Babylonian Empire in 586 BC, an event that left the city in ruins. Thus, in raising the specter of that earlier destruction, these officials cleverly remind the king of what happened when Jerusalem had been deemed rebellious before. Their words signal a deep distrust that could bring fear into the heart of an empire seeking to prevent further uprisings.
Moreover, the mention of “therefore that city was laid waste” (v.15) recalls the Exile and God’s people living for decades under foreign dominion. The returning exiles, however, believed they were fulfilling the prophetic hope of restoration (Isaiah 44:28) and rebuilding for the glory of God. From the greater biblical narrative, one can see echoes of divine restoration that will ultimately culminate in Jesus Christ, who brings the promise of renewal and reconciliation (Romans 8:21). The letter’s appeal to historical records was a strategic political maneuver, but God’s power often works through and in spite of political decisions. Ultimately, the opponents’ allegations here illustrate a broader spiritual conflict over worship, identity, and the covenant relationship between God and His people.
Set to dark mode
Ezra 4:15 meaning
“so that a search may be made in the record books of your fathers. And you will discover in the record books and learn that that city is a rebellious city and damaging to kings and provinces, and that they have incited revolt within it in past days; therefore that city was laid waste.” (Ezra 4:15) In this verse, the officials who oppose the rebuilding of Jerusalem wrote to King Artaxerxes (who reigned from about 465 BC to 424 BC) urging him to look into the historical records of their predecessors (v.15). Their goal was to prove that Jerusalem, the city being rebuilt by the returning exiles, had a long-standing reputation for political rebellion. The tactic they employed was to paint the city and its people as a threat, persuading the king that allowing the reconstruction to continue would be detrimental to Persia’s rule. This city they are referencing is Jerusalem, located in the region historically known as Judah. Jerusalem sits in the central part of the Judean hills, an area of great significance in the biblical record because it served as the political and spiritual capital under King David (around 1010-970 BC) and his successors. By claiming that records in the archives would confirm the rebellious nature of Jerusalem, these opponents intended to alarm King Artaxerxes into stopping the work. Their accusation echoes prior challenges faced by God’s people who were striving to obey Him by restoring the temple and reestablishing worship in Jerusalem (see also accounts of opposition in Nehemiah 4:7-8).
When the passage mentions “damaging to kings and provinces” (v.15), it underscores how the opponents were systematically framing the Jews’ rebuilding efforts as a threat to the stability of the Persian Empire. At that time, Persia was vast, encompassing multiple regions and peoples, and any sign of rebellion could quickly spread. The phrase “they have incited revolt within it in past days” (v.15) reflects how the city’s history—under certain kings—contained uprisings or resistance to foreign rule. Notably, Jerusalem had faced conquest and destruction under the Babylonian Empire in 586 BC, an event that left the city in ruins. Thus, in raising the specter of that earlier destruction, these officials cleverly remind the king of what happened when Jerusalem had been deemed rebellious before. Their words signal a deep distrust that could bring fear into the heart of an empire seeking to prevent further uprisings.
Moreover, the mention of “therefore that city was laid waste” (v.15) recalls the Exile and God’s people living for decades under foreign dominion. The returning exiles, however, believed they were fulfilling the prophetic hope of restoration (Isaiah 44:28) and rebuilding for the glory of God. From the greater biblical narrative, one can see echoes of divine restoration that will ultimately culminate in Jesus Christ, who brings the promise of renewal and reconciliation (Romans 8:21). The letter’s appeal to historical records was a strategic political maneuver, but God’s power often works through and in spite of political decisions. Ultimately, the opponents’ allegations here illustrate a broader spiritual conflict over worship, identity, and the covenant relationship between God and His people.